ArticleAsian journal of transfusion science
Panagglutination on the indirect antiglobulin test... this is the challenge!
Article in Asian journal of transfusion science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotype-Driven Resolution of Panagglutination Over a Decade of Korean Rare Blood Program Case Archives.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- Resolving the Interference of Anti-CD38 Antibodies on Blood Compatibility Assays Using CD38 "Baitbodies" Approach.Journal of immunology research · 2026Article
- CD36 antibodies in isoimmunized African-origin pregnant women: three years experience in Spain.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Panagglutination on the indirect antiglobulin test is one of the most challenging dilemmas of pretransfusion testing. It occurs when patient sera react with all red blood cells tested, that is, with both screening and identification panel cells. Two main questions must be answered. The first is to determine whether panagglutination results from the presence of autoantibody and/or alloantibody (single alloantibody or multiple alloantibodies or antibody to high-incidence antigen). The second problem is to detect the possible concomitant presence of clinically significant alloantibodies masked by panagglutination. The purpose of this mini-review is to describe the situations that can cause panagglutination and to develop algorithms which can resolve the problem. The two main points in the evaluation of panagglutination involve the assessment of the intensity of reactivity with the reagent red cells used and whether the autocontrol is positive or not. It is imperative to understand the laboratory results and the techniques available that guide the investigative process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.