ArticleAsian journal of transfusion science
Major and minor subgroup profile of blood in patients receiving multiple transfusions and donors.
Article in Asian journal of transfusion science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIt was aimed to profile the blood subgroups of our region and to reveal the prevalence of auto/alloimmune sensitization in patients who had to undergo multiple erythrocyte transfusions and to establish the sensitization profile by screening major and minor subgroups. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, the distribution of ABO and Rh system major subgroups was studied in 100 donor blood. As the patient group, 50 patients who received three or more red blood cell transfusions were included. In addition to this group, Kell, Lewis, Duffy blood group systems were studied.
resultsAccording to the ABO system, 35% of the donors were in O, 33% in A, 17% in AB, and 15% in B. According to the Rh system, 75% is Dvi positive. Rh system is 99% e positive and 33% E positive in major subgroups and Kell1 positivity is 8%. In the patient group, 22% D(-) was determined compared to Rh blood group. Among the major subgroups of Rh, C was 68%, E was 14%, c was 76%, and e positivity was found to be 100%. The Kell1 negativity rate is 96%. The highest negativity was found in 86% Lea antigen in Lewis system, in 36% S antigen in MNS system, 34% Fyb antigen in Duffy system, and 24% Jka antigen in Kidd system. When inappropriate blood is given for any antigen, a double population is formed. The double negativities we detected in our study occurred as follows according to blood group systems: E 18%, C 12%, c 8%, Cw 2%, Kell 1 2%, M 8%, N 4%, S 18%, s 6%, Fya 8%, Jka 6%, Jkb 22%. Indirect Agglutination Test (IAT) was negative in all patients.
conclusionIAT negativity in all patient groups suggests that we do not develop alloimmunization, but the high rates of double population suggest a high risk of alloimmunization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.