Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687530›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023

Accurate diagnostic tissue segmentation and concurrent disease subtyping with small datasets.

Steven J Frank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven J FrankMedA-Eye Technologies, Framingham, MA 01702, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To provide a flexible, end-to-end platform for visually distinguishing diseased from undiseased tissue in a medical image, in particular pathology slides, and classifying diseased regions by subtype. Highly accurate results are obtained using small training datasets and reduced-scale source images that can be easily shared. Approach: An ensemble of lightweight convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is trained on different subsets of images derived from a relatively small number of annotated whole-slide histopathology images (WSIs). The WSIs are first reduced in scale in a manner that preserves anatomic features critical to analysis while also facilitating convenient handling and storage. The segmentation and subtyping tasks are performed sequentially on the reduced-scale images using the same basic workflow: generating and sifting tiles from the image, then classifying each tile with an ensemble of appropriately trained CNNs. For segmentation, the CNN predictions are combined using a function to favor a selected similarity metric, and a mask or map for a a candidate image is produced from tiles whose combined predictions exceed a decision boundary. For subtyping, the resulting mask is applied to the candidate image, and new tiles are derived from the unoccluded regions. These are classified by the subtyping CNNs to produce an overall subtype prediction. Results and conclusion: This approach was applied successfully to two very different datasets of large WSIs, one (PAIP2020) involving multiple subtypes of colorectal cancer and the other (CAMELYON16) single-type breast cancer metastases. Scored using standard similarity metrics, the segmentations outperformed more complex models typifying the state of the art.

Indexed as

Deep learningDigital pathologyTissue segmentationWhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID36687530
PMCPMC9852683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.