ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2022
Contrast-induced encephalopathy and permanent neurological deficit following cerebral angiography: A case report and review of the literature.
Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severe contrast-induced encephalopathy with permanent motor dysfunction following secondary ioversol exposure.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Contrast-induced encephalopathy presenting with refractory status epilepticus following endovascular coiling of an intracranial aneurysm: A case report and literature review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Tetrabenazine-Responsive Choreo-Ballism and Akathisia After Cardioversion and Coronary Angiography: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Transient cortical blindness following coronary angiography: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Severe contrast-induced encephalopathy diagnosed with postmortem dual-energy CT in an elderly patient.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case Series.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Contrast Leakage and Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy Following Endovascular Treatment for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2024Article
- Contrast-induced encephalopathy following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is an uncommon complication associated with contrast exposure during angiographic procedures that is usually transient but occasionally leads to permanent complications or death. Due to the low incidence of CIE, there are still insufficient reports. This study was used to summarize the clinical features of CIE through a case report and systematic review. We summarized and reviewed 127 patients with CIE, and we found that the total incidence of CIE between men and women had no difference (49.61 and 50.39%, respectively), but the average age in female patients with CIE was older than that in male patients (62.19 and 58.77 years, respectively). Interestingly, the incidence of female patients with CIE in the poor prognosis group was significantly higher than that in the good prognosis group (62.50 and 36.51%, respectively), and the average age of these female patients in the poor prognosis group was younger than that in the good prognosis group (61.39 and 62.82 years, respectively). The contrast medium types were mainly nonionic (79.69 and 73.02%, respectively) and low-osmolar (54.69 and 71.43%, respectively) in both groups. Importantly, the total contrast media administrated in patients with poor prognoses was greater than that administrated in patients with good prognoses (198.07 and 188.60 ml, respectively). In addition, comorbidities in both groups included hypertension (55.91%), diabetes mellitus (20.47%), previous contrast history (15.75%), renal impairment (11.81%), and hyperlipidemia (3.15%). The percentage of patients with cerebral angiography was significantly higher in the poor prognosis group than that in the good prognosis group (37.50 and 9.52%, respectively), whereas the percentage of patients with coronary angiography in both groups had the opposite results (35.94 and 77.78%, respectively). In conclusion, CIE may not always have a benign outcome and can cause permanent deficits. Female gender, younger age, the higher dose of contrast medium, and the procedure of cerebral angiography may be related to the patient's poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.