Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687407›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Peripheral vascular catheter use in Latin America (the vascular study): A multinational cross-sectional study.

Rachel M Walker, Maria Paula Oliveira Pires, Gillian Ray-Barruel, Marie Cooke, Gabor Mihala, Silvia Schoenau Azevedo, Maria Angelica Sorgini Peterlini, Marcelle Di Angelis Ambar Felipe, Cirlia Petrona Álvarez, Marcela Quintanilla and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The I-DECIDEDJournal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Striving for vessel health preservation through standardized assessment: a Letter to the EditorValidation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Venous International Assessment Scale and proposal of revisionUse of short peripheral intravenous catheters: characteristics, management, and outcomes worldwideRisk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis in adult patientsPeripheral vascular catheter use in Latin America (the vascular study): a multinational cross-sectional studyGuidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measuresABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index CalculationPsychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validadeTranslation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Venous International Assessment Scale to European Portuguese.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Rachel M WalkerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Maria Paula Oliveira PiresAlliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research (AVATAR), School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Gillian Ray-BarruelSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Marie CookeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Gabor MihalaCentre for Applied Health Economics, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Silvia Schoenau AzevedoPediatric Nursing Department, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Angelica Sorgini PeterliniPediatric Nursing Department, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelle Di Angelis Ambar FelipePediatric Nursing Department, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cirlia Petrona ÁlvarezInfection Control Service, Asociación de Terapia de Infusión y Seguridad del Paciente (ATISPA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcela QuintanillaSociedad Chilena de Terapia de Intravenosa (SOCHITEIN), Santiago, Chile.
Martha Claudia CorzoAsociación Colombiana de Terapia Intravascular (ACOTEIN), Bogotá, Colombia.
Gabriela Cortez VillarealNational Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chávez, Directorate of Quality and Health Education of the Ministry of Health of Mexico, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Eliazib Nataren CigarroaDr. Jesús Gilberto Gómez Maza Hospital, Health Services of the State of Chiapas, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico.
Mavilde L G PedreiraAlliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research (AVATAR), School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Claire M RickardSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Griffith University · AUUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRInstituto Nacional de Cardiología · MXSociedad de Biología de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion is one of the most common clinical procedures worldwide, yet little data are available from Latin America. Our aim was to describe processes and practices regarding PIVC use in hospitalized patients related to hospital guidelines, characteristics of PIVC inserters, prevalence of PIVC complications, and idle PIVCs. Methods: In 2019 we conducted a multinational, cross-sectional study of adult and pediatric patients with a PIVC in hospitals from five Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. We used two data collection tools to collect hospital guidelines and patient-specific data on the day of the study. The vessel health and preservation (VHP) model guided synthesis of the study aims/questions and suggested opportunities for improvement. Results: A total of 9,620 PIVCs in adult (86%) and pediatric inpatients in 132 hospitals were assessed. Routine replacement 8-72 hourly was recommended for adults in 22% of hospitals, rather than evidence-based clinical assessment-based durations, and 69% of hospitals allowed the use of non-sterile tape rather than the international standard of a sterile dressing. The majority (52%) of PIVCs were inserted by registered nurses (RNs), followed by nursing assistants/technicians (41%). Eight percent of PIVCs had pain, hyperemia, or edema, 6% had blood in the extension tubing/connector, and 3% had dried blood around the device. Most PIVCs had been inserted for intravenous medications (81%) or fluids (59%) in the previous 24 h, but 9% were redundant. Conclusion: Given the variation in policies, processes and practices across countries and participating hospitals, clinical guidelines should be available in languages other than English to support clinician skills and knowledge to improve PIVC safety and quality. Existing and successful vascular access societies should be encouraged to expand their reach and encourage other countries to join in multinational communities of practice.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studyintravenous infusionmultinational perspectivesprevalence studyvascular access devicevascular catheter

Identifiers

PMID36687407
PMCPMC9846050
OpenAlexW4313584346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.