ArticleBrain communications2023
Mapping behavioural, cognitive and affective transdiagnostic dimensions in frontotemporal dementia.
Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards a Multidimensional Model of Neurocognitive Disorders (MOND Model): Integrating Evidence from a Critical Review into a Model for Future Research.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Behavioural changes in frontotemporal dementia and their cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Comparing clinical features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using network analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Theory of mind deficits in non-fluent primary progressive aphasia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025Article
- Behavioural and cognitive profiles in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Behavioural and cognitive profiles in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- The graded multidimensional geometry of phenotypic variation and progression in neurodegenerative syndromes.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Rethinking the diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia: current challenges and future directions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- The impact of bilateral versus unilateral anterior temporal lobe damage on face recognition, person knowledge and semantic memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- A neuroanatomical and cognitive model of impaired social behaviour in frontotemporal dementia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Assessing network degeneration and phenotypic heterogeneity in genetic frontotemporal lobar degeneration by decoding FDG-PET.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2024Article
- Social-semantic knowledge in frontotemporal dementia and after anterior temporal lobe resection.Brain communications · 2024Article
- The neural substrates of transdiagnostic cognitive-linguistic heterogeneity in primary progressive aphasia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Quantitative Electroencephalography Markers for an Accurate Diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia: A Spectral Power Ratio Approach.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Understanding the multidimensional cognitive deficits of logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Review
- The neurophysiological effect of NMDA-R antagonism of frontotemporal lobar degeneration is conditional on individual GABA concentration.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Modeling contributions of cognition and apathy to functional impairment in younger-onset dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Longitudinal changes in functional capacity in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Two common clinical variants of frontotemporal dementia are the behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, presenting with behavioural and personality changes attributable to prefrontal atrophy, and semantic dementia, displaying early semantic dysfunction primarily due to anterior temporal degeneration. Despite representing independent diagnostic entities, mounting evidence indicates overlapping cognitive-behavioural profiles in these syndromes, particularly with disease progression. Why such overlap occurs remains unclear. Understanding the nature of this overlap, however, is essential to improve early diagnosis, characterization and management of those affected. Here, we explored common cognitive-behavioural and neural mechanisms contributing to heterogeneous frontotemporal dementia presentations, irrespective of clinical diagnosis. This transdiagnostic approach allowed us to ascertain whether symptoms not currently considered core to these two syndromes are present in a significant proportion of cases and to explore the neural basis of clinical heterogeneity. Sixty-two frontotemporal dementia patients (31 behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and 31 semantic dementia) underwent comprehensive neuropsychological, behavioural and structural neuroimaging assessments. Orthogonally rotated principal component analysis of neuropsychological and behavioural data uncovered eight statistically independent factors explaining the majority of cognitive-behavioural performance variation in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. These factors included Behavioural changes, Semantic dysfunction, General Cognition, Executive function, Initiation, Disinhibition, Visuospatial function and Affective changes. Marked individual-level overlap between behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia was evident on the Behavioural changes, General Cognition, Initiation, Disinhibition and Affective changes factors. Compared to behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia patients displayed disproportionate impairment on the Semantic dysfunction factor, whereas greater impairment on Executive and Visuospatial function factors was noted in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Both patient groups showed comparable magnitude of atrophy to frontal regions, whereas severe temporal lobe atrophy was characteristic of semantic dementia. Whole-brain voxel-based morphometry correlations with emergent factors revealed associations between fronto-insular and striatal grey matter changes with Behavioural, Executive and Initiation factor performance, bilateral temporal atrophy with Semantic dysfunction factor scores, parietal-subcortical regions with General Cognitive performance and ventral temporal atrophy associated with Visuospatial factor scores. Together, these findings indicate that cognitive-behavioural overlap (i) occurs systematically in frontotemporal dementia; (ii) varies in a graded manner between individuals and (iii) is associated with degeneration of different neural systems. Our findings suggest that phenotypic heterogeneity in frontotemporal dementia syndromes can be captured along continuous, multidimensional spectra of cognitive-behavioural changes. This has implications for the diagnosis of both syndromes amidst overlapping features as well as the design of symptomatic treatments applicable to multiple syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.