Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687294›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2022

Risk Projection for Time-to-event Outcome Leveraging Summary Statistics With Source Individual-level Data.

Jiayin Zheng, Yingye Zheng, Li Hsu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Improved risk prediction via cross-domain calibration in a retrospective case-control study.The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiayin ZhengPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Yingye ZhengPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Li HsuPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

The Early Detection Research Network: Data Management and Coordinating CenterU24CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RUTH D ETZIONI, Ziding Feng · 2010 to 2026
$75.7M
EDRN--DATA MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATING CENTERU01CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI FENG, ZIDING · 2000 to 2010
$16.9M
Statistical Methods for Analysis of Tumor Heterogeneity in Genetic EpidemiologyR01CA189532 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSU, LI · 2015 to 2023
$4.2M
High-Performance Compute Cluster for Comprehensive Cancer and Infectious Diseases ResearchS10OD028685 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BRADLEY, PHILIP · 2020 to 2020
$2.0M
Statistical Methods for Prospective Evaluation of BiomarkersR01CA236558 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ZHENG, YINGYE · 2019 to 2024
$1.9M
Statistical Methods for Genetic Epidemiology StudiesR01CA195789 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HSU, LI · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA189532NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195789NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236558NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086368NCI NIH HHS U24 CA086368NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600003CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600018CNIH HHS S10 OD028685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting risks of chronic diseases has become increasingly important in clinical practice. When a prediction model is developed in a cohort, there is a great interest to apply the model to other cohorts. Due to potential discrepancy in baseline disease incidences between different cohorts and shifts in patient composition, the risk predicted by the model built in the source cohort often under- or over-estimates the risk in a new cohort. In this article, we assume the relative risks of predictors are the same between the two cohorts, and propose a novel weighted estimating equation approach to re-calibrating the projected risk for the targeted population through updating the baseline risk. The recalibration leverages the knowledge about survival probabilities for the disease of interest and competing events, and summary information of risk factors from the target population. We establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed estimators. Extensive simulation demonstrate that the proposed estimators are robust, even if the risk factor distributions differ between the source and target populations, and gain efficiency if they are the same, as long as the information from the target is precise. The method is illustrated with a recalibration of colorectal cancer prediction model.

Indexed as

Absolute riskCalibrationEmpirical likelihoodExternal generalizability

Identifiers

PMID36687294
PMCPMC9855229
OpenAlexW3135744926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.