Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687246›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2022

Utility of Scrape Cytology in Management of Ovarian Neoplasms: a Cross-sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Eastern India.

Aparajita Samaddar, Manas Talukdar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aparajita SamaddarDepartment of Pathology, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, 88, College Street, Kolkata, 700073 West Bengal India.ORCID 0000-0002-0168-3136
Manas TalukdarDepartment of Pathology, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, 88, College Street, Kolkata, 700073 West Bengal India.ORCID 0000-0003-0716-7762
KPC Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian tumors are one of the most common gynecological neoplasms worldwide affecting women of all ages. As preoperative diagnosis is often inaccurate, intraoperative diagnostic modalities play indispensable role in management of ovarian tumors to avoid unnecessary extensive surgery. Although reliable, frozen section is highly expensive for resource-poor developing countries. Intraoperative cytological methods can help to overcome these limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of scrape cytology in diagnosis of ovarian tumors. The freshly removed specimens of ovarian tumors sent without any fixative during the study period were included in this observational prospective cross-sectional study. Scraping was done from the most representative area of the cut surface of the tumor. Cytological smears were stained by hematoxylin-eosin method. All the cytological smears and corresponding histological sections were evaluated separately. Cytological interpretation was then compared with histological diagnosis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of scrape cytology. On histology, 66 cases were diagnosed as benign (60%), 5 cases as borderline (4.55%), and 39 as malignant (35.45%). Of these, 64 cases (58%) were of epithelial origin, 25 cases (22.7%) were of germ cell origin and 6 (5.45%) cases were categorized as sex cord-stromal tumor. Accuracy of scrape cytology in diagnosis of benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors was found to be 95.45%, 40%, and 89.74%, respectively. Overall accuracy rate was 90.91%. Scrape cytology is a rapid, inexpensive yet effective tool to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian tumors with high diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Diagnostic accuracyOvarian neoplasmsScrape cytology

Identifiers

PMID36687246
PMCPMC9845473
OpenAlexW4287147419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.