Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687234›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2022

Anaplastic Cancer: Our Experience.

Aditya Pavan Kumar Kanteti, Joy Ghose, Vijay Maruti Patil, Anup Sunil Tamhankar, George Abraham, Vanita Noronha, Sarbani Ghosh Laskar, Nandini Sharrel Menon, Prathamesh S Pai, Kumar Prabhash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aditya Pavan Kumar Kanteti *Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Joy Ghose *Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Vijay Maruti Patil *Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Anup Sunil Tamhankar *Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
George Abraham *Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Sarbani Ghosh LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Nandini Sharrel MenonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Prathamesh S PaiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare thyroid malignancy with a dire prognosis, nearly 100% disease specific mortality and a median overall survival less than 6 months. In view of the limited data from India on anaplastic thyroid cancer, we conducted this audit to analyze the treatment pattern, outcomes and factors influencing it. This is a retrospective analysis of outcomes of patients treated in a single institution between January 2008 and December 2020. Baseline characteristics, treatment received, and outcomes among adult patients with ATC were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. SPSS version 20 and RStudio version 3.1.1 were used for analysis. In this cohort of 134 patients, the median age at diagnosis was 59 years, with 63.4% of them being females. At presentation, 70.9% of them had good performance status (PS 0-1). Only 38.8% received treatment with curative intent (either surgery fb adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy fb surgery and adjuvant or definitive chemoradiotherapy) while 61.2% patients received palliative treatment (either palliation alone or palliative chemotherapy or palliative surgery or palliative RT). Predominant pattern of progression was local progression (79.8%). Median PFS and OS of the overall cohort were 58 days and 80 days respectively. PFS and OS were significantly better in patients treated with curative intent vs palliative intent (116 and 134 days vs 45 and 50 days;

Indexed as

Anaplastic carcinomaAuditOutcomeSystemic therapyThyroid

Identifiers

PMID36687234
PMCPMC9845457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.