Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687233›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2022

Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm - Case Series and Review of Literature.

Lalit Kumar Bansal, Neeti Kapur, Arun Kumar Gupta, Ashutosh Nagpal, Poras Chaudhary

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lalit Kumar BansalDepartment of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0478-428X
Neeti KapurDepartment of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Arun Kumar GuptaDepartment of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Ashutosh NagpalDepartment of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Poras ChaudharyDepartment of Surgery, ABVIMS and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a variety of solid and cystic tumors of the pancreas. It was first described by Frantz in 1959. It is an unusual form of pancreatic carcinoma, with unknown etiopathogenesis, which accounts for about 0.17 to 2.7% of all pancreatic tumors. Here, we are describing 5 cases of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, out of 180 pancreatic tumors, operated in our institution in the 5-year period (2015-2020). Also, we have reviewed all available case series (from 2006 to 2020) in the literature, of pancreatic pseudopapillary neoplasm, for demographic information, etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, and extent of operation to establish the optimal management of this condition. Retrospective analysis of pancreatic tumors was carried out from February 2015 to January 2020. A total of 180 patients underwent pancreatic resection in this period for pancreatic tumor, out of which, the solid pseudopapillary neoplasm was confirmed in 5 cases (2.76%). Among these 5 cases, 4 cases (80%) were female and one (20%) male, with age group range from 14 to 45 years (mean age - 28 years). Abdominal pain was the most frequent presenting symptom (60%). Mean tumor diameter was 6.9 cm (range, 2-18 cm). Two patients were diagnosed preoperatively by CECT and MRI findings, and three patients were diagnosed preoperatively by percutaneous/USG-guided and CT-guided FNA cytology. Two patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy; one patient underwent enucleation; and two patients underwent spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy. Four patients are alive and on regular follow-up, while one patient died on the 5th post-operative day due to post-operative sepsis.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryPancreasPancreatoduodenectomySolid pseudopapillary neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID36687233
PMCPMC9845477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.