ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2022
A gait phase prediction model trained on benchmark datasets for evaluating a controller for prosthetic legs.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simplifying rehabilitation control of lower-limb exoskeletons in five ambulation modes via dataset-driven state-machine calibration.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- FusionTCN-Attention: A Causality-Preserving Temporal Model for Unilateral IMU-Based Gait Prediction and Cooperative Exoskeleton Control.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Drug involvement variations in overdose death spikes: county-level analysis in Massachusetts.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Implementing Gait Kinematic Trajectory Forecasting Models on an Embedded System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Generating synthetic gait patterns based on benchmark datasets for controlling prosthetic legs.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Digital measurement of mobility in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A structured review of an emerging area.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Powered lower-limb assistive devices, such as prostheses and exoskeletons, are a promising option for helping mobility-impaired individuals regain functional gait. Gait phase prediction plays an important role in controlling these devices and evaluating whether the device generates a gait similar to that of individuals with intact limbs. This study proposes a gait phase prediction method based on a deep neural network (DNN). The long short-term memory (LSTM)-based model predicts a continuous gait phase from the 250 ms history of the vertical load, thigh angle, knee angle, and ankle angle, commonly available on powered lower-limb assistive devices. One unified model was trained using publicly available benchmark datasets containing intact limb gaits for level-ground walking (LGW) and ascending stairs (SA). A phase prediction error of 1.28% for all benchmark datasets was obtained. The model was subsequently applied to a state machine-controlled powered prosthetic leg dataset collected from four individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation. The gait phase prediction results (a phase prediction error of 5.70%) indicate that the model trained on benchmark data can be used for a system not included in the training dataset with no post-processing, such as model adaptation. Furthermore, it provided information regarding evaluation of the controller: whether the prosthetic leg generated normal gait. In conclusion, the proposed gait phase prediction model will facilitate efficient gait prediction and evaluation of controllers for powered lower-limb assistive devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.