ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2023
Diabetic wounds and artificial intelligence: A mini-review.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting wound healing outcomes: a comparative accuracy analysis of AI-driven indices and percent area reduction.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- [Multidisciplinary integration in the diagnosis and treatment in burns and wound repair surgery: current status, challenges, and future].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Review
- Current status, challenges, and prospects of artificial intelligence applications in wound repair theranostics.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Wound Care Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Comparative study on the efficacy of PRP gel and UC-MSCs gel as adjuvant therapies in the treatment of DFU wounds.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic wound takes longer time to heal due to micro and macro-vascular ailment. This longer healing time can lead to infections and other health complications. Foot ulcers are one of the most common diabetic wounds. These are one of the leading cause of amputations. Medical science is continuously striving for improving quality of human life. A recent trend of amalgamation of knowledge, efforts and technological advancement of medical science experts and artificial intelligence researchers, has made tremendous success in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of a variety of diseases. Diabetic wounds are no exception, as artificial intelligence experts are putting their research efforts to apply latest technological advancements in the field to help medical care personnel to deal with diabetic wounds in more effective manner. The presented study reviews the diagnostic and treatment research under the umbrella of Artificial Intelligence and computational science, for diabetic wound healing. Framework for diabetic wound assessment using artificial intelligence is presented. Moreover, this review is focused on existing and potential contribution of artificial intelligence to improve medical services for diabetic wound patients. The article also discusses the future directions for the betterment of the field that can lead to facilitate both, clinician and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.