Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686972›Full record

ReviewJAMIA open2023

A systematic review of the effectiveness of patient education through patient portals.

Adam M Johnson, Andrew S Brimhall, Erica T Johnson, Jennifer Hodgson, Katharine Didericksen, Joseph Pye, G J Corey Harmon, Kerry B Sewell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Design and evaluation patient portal for patients with HTLV-1.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adam M JohnsonDepartment of Human Development & Family Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Andrew S BrimhallDepartment of Human Development & Family Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Erica T JohnsonDepartment of Human Development & Family Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Jennifer HodgsonDepartment of Human Development & Family Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Katharine DidericksenDepartment of Human Development & Family Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Joseph PyeDepartment of Family Medicine, ECU Health, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
G J Corey HarmonLaupus Library, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-4414
Kerry B SewellLaupus Library, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0405-3789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to systematically review all literature studying the effect of patient education on patient engagement through patient portals. Introduction: Patient portals provide patients access to health records, lab results, medication refills, educational materials, secure messaging, appointment scheduling, and telehealth visits, allowing patients to take a more active role in their health care decisions and management. A debate remains around whether these additional aids actually improve patient engagement and increase their ability to manage their own health conditions. This systematic review looks specifically at the effect of educational materials included in patient portals. Materials and Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, the literature search was mapped across 5 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsychINFO, Embase), and implemented on June 2, 2020. Results: Fifty-two studies were included in the review. Forty-six (88.5%) reported rates of patient utilization of educational resources in the patient portal. Thirty (57.9%) shared patients' perceptions of the usefulness of the education materials. Twenty-one (40.4%) reported changes in health outcomes following educational interventions through the patient portal. This review found that efforts are indeed being made to raise awareness of educational resources in patient portals, that patients are increasingly utilizing these resources, that patients are finding them useful, and that they are improving health outcomes. Conclusion: It seems that patient portals are becoming a powerful tool for patient education and engagement, and show promise as a means of achieving the quadruple aim of healthcare. Moving forward, research should establish more uniform methods of measurement in order to strengthen the literature surrounding the effectiveness of patient education through patient portals.

Indexed as

patient educationpersonal health records

Identifiers

PMID36686972
PMCPMC9847535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.