Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686961›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of criminal justice : AJCJ2022

Examining Sanction Type and Drug Offender Recidivism: A Register-Based Study in Finland.

Bryan Lee Miller, Noora Ellonen, John H Boman, Shelagh Dorn, Karoliina Suonpää, Olli-Pekka Aaltonen, Atte Oksanen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of criminal justice : AJCJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bryan Lee MillerDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5806-0511
Noora EllonenFaculty of Social Science, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
John H BomanDepartmentof Sociology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.
Shelagh DornDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Karoliina SuonpääInstitute of Criminology and Legal Policy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli-Pekka AaltonenInstitute of Criminology and Legal Policy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Atte OksanenFaculty of Social Science, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Clemson University · USTampere University · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIBowling Green State University · US

Funding

Computing and Data CoreP2CHD050959 · NICHD · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, SUSAN L. · 2016 to 2021
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nordic countries incarcerate offenders at much lower rates in comparison with incarceration rates in the United States, and reincarcerate fewer people per capita. Noncustodial alternatives to sanctions, including fines and community service, are used extensively in Finland to reduce negative effects of institutionalization and subsequent disadvantage caused by incarceration. The nature of drug-involved offenders within the Finnish system is reviewed in light of current research about the effectiveness of incarceration and deterrence-based approaches for drug offenders. Employing a 2014 sample from register data (consisting of official government records) of drug offenders in Finland with a 3-year recidivism period, this study utilizes a genetic matching procedure to compare offenders who received fines, conditional sentences (probation), or incarceration. While recognizing that numerous confounding variables affect incarceration, we compare a matched sample of drug offenders and the sanctions they have received from the Finland judicial system to determine whether offenders who initially receive a fine or a conditional sentence reenter the correctional system at different rates than those who are incarcerated. After matching, results found no significant differences between offenders receiving incarceration sentences or those who received noncustodial sentences (fine, or conditional sentence) for general and drug-related recidivism. These results are presented within the context of the Finnish corrections system in order to inform the criminal justice community about culture, incarceration, and process differences that could positively affect working with drug offenders in other localities.

Indexed as

CorrectionsDeterrenceDrug offendersFinlandIncarcerationRecidivism

Identifiers

PMID36686961
PMCPMC9850411
OpenAlexW3120299181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.