Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686808›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Machine-learning prediction model for acute skin toxicity after breast radiation therapy using spectrophotometry.

Savino Cilla, Carmela Romano, Gabriella Macchia, Mariangela Boccardi, Donato Pezzulla, Milly Buwenge, Augusto Di Castelnuovo, Francesca Bracone, Amalia De Curtis, Chiara Cerletti and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Savino CillaMedical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Carmela RomanoMedical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Gabriella MacchiaRadiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Mariangela BoccardiRadiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Donato PezzullaRadiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Milly BuwengeRadiation Oncology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Augusto Di CastelnuovoMediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy.
Francesca BraconeDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Amalia De CurtisDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Chiara CerlettiDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Licia IacovielloDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Maria Benedetta DonatiDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Francesco DeodatoRadiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Alessio Giuseppe MorgantiRadiation Oncology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Molise · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITClinica Mediterranea · ITUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Radiation-induced skin toxicity is a common and distressing side effect of breast radiation therapy (RT). We investigated the use of quantitative spectrophotometric markers as input parameters in supervised machine learning models to develop a predictive model for acute radiation toxicity. Methods and materials: One hundred twenty-nine patients treated for adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy were evaluated. Two spectrophotometer variables, i.e. the melanin (I Results: Thirty-four (26.4%) patients presented with adverse skin effects (RTOG ≥2) at the end of treatment. The two spectrophotometric variables at the beginning of RT (I Conclusions: Spectrophotometry is an objective and reliable tool able to assess radiation induced skin tissue injury. Using a machine learning approach, we were able to predict grade RTOG ≥2 skin toxicity in patients undergoing breast RT. This approach may prove useful for treatment management aiming to improve patient quality of life.

Indexed as

breastmachine learningradiation oncologyspectrophotometrytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID36686808
PMCPMC9853396
OpenAlexW4313650822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.