Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686794›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Tissue distribution of ethanol after intraprostatic injection using a porous needle.

Megan N Eubank, Ján Švihra, Kevin C DiBona, Matthew Sommers, Tyler Oe, Ján Strnádel, Juraj Miklušica, Peter Szépe, Juraj Marcinek, Benjamin J King and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Megan N EubankBiomedical Laboratory and Research Unit of Urology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ján ŠvihraDepartment of Urology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Kevin C DiBonaBiomedical Laboratory and Research Unit of Urology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Matthew SommersDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Tyler OeGeneral Surgery, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, NJ, United States.
Ján StrnádelBiomedical Center, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Juraj MiklušicaDepartment of Surgery and Transplant Center, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Peter SzépeDepartment of Pathological Anatomy, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovakia.
Juraj MarcinekDepartment of Pathological Anatomy, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovakia.
Benjamin J KingDepartment of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Mark K PlanteDepartment of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Ján ĽuptákDepartment of Urology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Mads Hvid Aaberg PoulsenResearch Unit of Urology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Masatoshi KidaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington VT, United States.
Eduard BacoDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ján ŠvihraDepartment of Urology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Peter ZvaraBiomedical Laboratory and Research Unit of Urology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Comenius University Bratislava · SKUniversity of Vermont · USMartin University Hospital · SKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKAtlantic Health System · USOdense University Hospital · DKOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a safe and precise method for intraprostatic injection, and to establish correlation between the volume of ethanol injectate and the volume of subsequent infiltrated prostate tissue. Materials and methods: We performed intraprostatic injection of 96% ethanol using a needle which has a segment of its wall made of capillary membrane with hundreds of pores in an acute and chronic canine experiment, in heart-beating cadaveric organ donors, and in a xenograft model of human prostate cancer. Whole mount tissue sections were used for three-dimensional reconstruction of the necrotic lesions and calculation of their volumes. Results: The ethanol injection resulted in oval shaped lesions of well-delineated coagulative necrosis. In both healthy human and canine prostates, the prostatic pseudocapsule and neurovascular bundle remained intact without evidence of disruption. There was a linear correlation between administered volume of ethanol and the volume of necrotic lesion. Regression analysis showed strong correlation in the acute canine experiments and in experiments performed on xenografts of human prostate cancer. A formula was calculated for each experiment to estimate the relationship between the injected volume and the volume of infiltrated prostate tissue area. Conclusions: Intraprostatic injection using a porous needle allows for effective and predictable tissue distribution of the injectate in the prostate. Through varying the volume of the agent injected and use of needles with a different length of the porous segment, the volume of infiltrated tissue could be adjusted allowing for targeted focal treatment.

Indexed as

organ-confined prostate cancerporous needleprostatetissue diffusionUltrasound-guided targeted injection

Identifiers

PMID36686794
PMCPMC9846807
OpenAlexW4313492958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.