ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023
Values of COVID-19 Self-Testing among Urban and Rural South Africans: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility and acceptability of COVID-19 self-testing offered through community screening posts in Mozambique: a mixed-methods study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Acceptability of Covid-19 self-testing among Primary Health Care users.Revista de saude publica · 2026Article
- Feasibility of self-testing for acute malaria using rapid diagnostic tests in three peri-urban sub-Saharan African community settings.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Decision-makers' perspectives on the implementation of COVID-19 self-testing in Mozambique.Public health action · 2025Article
- Uptake, Acceptability, and Results of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Community Settings in Cameroon.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Utility, comfort and feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic testing integration into routine care: a cross-sectional survey assessing healthcare workers' perspectives in Kenya and Cameroon.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Evaluating the feasibility and attitudes towards SARS-CoV-2 self-testing in a rural population in Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional survey.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Evaluation of COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing in Lesotho and Zambia.PloS one · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 self-testing in Peru: a cross-sectional survey of values and attitudes of the general population.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Public's Willingness to Perform COVID-19 Self-Testing During the Transition to the Endemic Phase in Malaysia - A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-testing for COVID-19 may be a preferable strategy for identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection among populations in low- and middle-income settings. To determine South Africans' values related to COVID-19 self-testing should it become widely available, a cross-sectional survey was administered in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal Province and the King Sabata Dalindyebo sub-district of the Eastern Cape. A 35-question survey was administered to 531 participants (268 female) in one urban and one rural setting of South Africa. Survey participants were randomly selected by household in the rural setting, while in the urban setting participants were approached in randomly selected public places. The survey assessed participants' likelihood of using and willingness to pay for a COVID-19 self-test and actions they would take following a COVID-19 self-test. The results were analysed using descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariate regression. Overall, 93.03% of participants supported COVID-19 self-testing, 61.62% of participants were willing to pay for self-testing, and 90.15% indicated they would communicate their results if they tested positive. Rural participants were more positively associated with each of these outcomes compared with urban-based participants. Should they test positive, most participants said they would: go in-person to a health facility for counselling (76.45%), self-isolate (95.85%), notify close contacts (97.74%), and inform their employer (95.14%). COVID-19 self-testing was a preferable option for most participants, although this varied with setting and demographic characteristics. Self-testing may overcome barriers to care for South Africans, but to achieve this, policies for self-testing and delivery methods must not exacerbate individuals' underlying economic vulnerabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.