Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686586›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2023

Do tax and subsidy on unhealthy food induce consumer consumption for healthy food? Evidence from experiment in Surabaya, Indonesia.

Ni Made Sukartini, Rudi Purwono, Endang Retno Surjaningrum, Thinzar Win, Grace Wangge, Adrian Chrisnahutama, Afanin Husna, Triwuli Handayani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ni Made SukartiniDepartement Ilmu Ekonomi, FEB Universitas Airlangga and Magister Ekonomi Kesehatan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8021-0689
Rudi PurwonoDepartement Ilmu Ekonomi, FEB Universitas Airlangga and Magister Ekonomi Kesehatan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Endang Retno SurjaningrumFakultas Psikologi Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Thinzar WinDepartment of Economics, University of Mandalay, Republic of Union of Myanmar.
Grace WanggeFakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia and SEAMEO RECFON.
Adrian ChrisnahutamaMagister Ilmu Ekonomi, FEB Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Afanin HusnaMagister Ilmu Ekonomi, FEB Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Triwuli HandayaniMagister Ilmu Ekonomi, FEB Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Airlangga University · IDMandalay University · MMUniversity of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the impact of price changes on decision to buy particular foods among adults in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. Tax and subsidy were introduced for influencing decision buy particular foods, especially unhealthy foods that are predicted have consequences on health outcome. Unhealthy foods such as fast foods or junk foods, sugar sweetened beverages (SSB), salty, and fatty foods are reported as one of main causes of obesity incidence in most countries, such as Indonesia. Design and method: Computer laboratory experimental is designed for investigating the impacts of difference rates of taxes and subsidy on decision to buy foods. Taxes and subsidies rate are designed from low (5%), moderate (15%), and high rates (25%). Results: The findings are as follows. Firstly, participants do not respond immediately to price changes, that is, higher prices due to taxes and lower prices due to subsidies. Economic theory suggests that consumers demand for basic need such as foods is sensitive with change in price, they respond inversely to the price changes. However, the finding in this experimental study do not support this theory prediction. Secondly, 15% and subsidies are the threshold and the larger taxes and rate for changing consumer's choices on targeted foods. Conclusion: This study concludes that low rates of taxes and subsidies for unhealthy and healthy foods make these targeted foods affordable for majority of consumers. Besides introducing higher rates of taxes and subsidies, promoting and encouraging healthy life style such as consuming fresh and healthy foods is another alternative policy option.

Indexed as

health promotionhealthy and unhealthy foodstaxes and subsidies

Identifiers

PMID36686586
PMCPMC9850130
OpenAlexW4316813425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.