Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Survey of understanding and awareness of fertility preservation in pediatric patients: Is conversation about fertility preservation unpleasant for pediatric patients?

Seido Takae, Yuriko Iwahata, Yodo Sugishita, Hideyuki Iwahata, Ryo Kanamori, Eriko Shiraishi, Kaoru Ito, Yuki Suzuki, Yoshiko Yamaya, Kunihide Tanaka and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seido TakaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuriko IwahataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yodo SugishitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hideyuki IwahataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ryo KanamoriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Eriko ShiraishiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kaoru ItoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuki SuzukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshiko YamayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kunihide TanakaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Kei OyamaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Dai KeinoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Pediatric Department Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kentaro NakamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kei OdawaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuki HorageDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Lingbo MengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Arby IgualadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ahmad Mohd FaizalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ludmilla Ogouma AworetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shigeyuki FurutaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Miki SakamotoDepartment of ObGyn, UKM Medical Centre, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Tetsuya MoriDepartment of Anesthesiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroaki KitagawaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Nao SuzukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
St. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPUniversity Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To verify understanding and awareness of fertility preservation (FP) in pediatric patients undergoing FP treatments. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted before and after explanation of fertility issues and FP treatments for patients 6-17 years old who visited or were hospitalized for the purpose of ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) or oocyte cryopreservation (OC), or sperm cryopreservation between October 2018 and April 2022. This study was approved by the institutional review board at St. Marianna University School of Medicine (No. 4123, UMIN000046125). Result: Participants in the study comprised 36 children (34 girls, 2 boys). Overall mean age was 13.3 ± 3.0 years. The underlying diseases were diverse, with leukemia in 14 patients (38.9%), brain tumor in 4 patients (11.1%). The questionnaire survey before the explanation showed that 19 patients (52.8%) wanted to have children in the future, but 15 (41.7%) were unsure of future wishes to raise children. And most children expressed some degree of understanding of the treatment being planned for the underlying disease (34, 94.4%). Similarly, most children understood that the treatment would affect their fertility (33, 91.7%). When asked if they would like to hear a story about how to become a mother or father after FP which including information of FP, half answered "Don't mind" (18, 50.0%). After being provided with information about FP treatment, all participants answered that they understood the adverse effects on fertility of treatments for the underlying disease. Regarding FP treatment, 32 children (88.9%) expressed understanding for FP and 26 (72.2%) wished to receive FP. "Fear" and "Pain" and "Costs" were frequently cited as concerns about FP. Following explanations, 33 children (91.7%) answered "Happy I heard the story" and no children answered, "Wish I hadn't heard the story". Finally, 28 of the 34 girls (82.4%) underwent OTC and one girl underwent OC. Discussion: The fact that all patients responded positively to the explanations of FP treatment is very informative. This is considered largely attributable to the patients themselves being involved in the decision-making process for FP. Conclusions: Explanations of FP for children appear valid if age-appropriate explanations are provided.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsFertility PreservationCryopreservationHumansMaleSemenSurveys and Questionnaireschildren’s response to fertility preservation explanationsfertility preservationoncofertilityoocyte cryopreservationovarian tissue cryopreservationpediatric cancer

Identifiers

PMID36686445
PMCPMC9853553
OpenAlexW4313625180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.