Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686369›Full record

ArticleCoordination chemistry reviews2022

Ru(II) CONTAINING PHOTOSENSITIZERS FOR PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY: A CRITIQUE ON REPORTING AND AN ATTEMPT TO COMPARE EFFICACY.

Manjunatha Ankathatti Munegowda, Angelica Manalac, Madrigal Weersink, Houston D Cole, Sherri A McFarland, Lothar Lilge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Coordination chemistry reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The Many Lives of [Ru(bpy)Inorganic chemistry · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Highways and Detours in the Realm of Photodynamic Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Pyrenyl-Substituted Imidazo[4,5-Inorganic chemistry · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Manjunatha Ankathatti MunegowdaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7683-5731
Angelica ManalacPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Madrigal WeersinkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Houston D ColeDept of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2922-2163
Sherri A McFarlandDept of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8028-5055
Lothar LilgePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5533-0005
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Immunomodulating Ruthenium Metal Complexes for Melanoma PhotodynamicTherapyR01CA222227 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI GUJAR, SHASHI, MCFARLAND, SHERRI · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruthenium(II)-based coordination complexes have emerged as photosensitizers (PSs) for photodynamic therapy (PDT) in oncology as well as antimicrobial indications and have great potential. Their modular architectures that integrate multiple ligands can be exploited to tune cellular uptake and subcellular targeting, solubility, light absorption, and other photophysical properties. A wide range of Ru(II) containing compounds have been reported as PSs for PDT or as photochemotherapy (PCT) agents. Many studies employ a common scaffold that is subject to systematic variation in one or two ligands to elucidate the impact of these modifications on the photophysical and photobiological performance. Studies that probe the excited state energies and dynamics within these molecules are of fundamental interest and are used to design next-generation systems. However, a comparison of the PDT efficacy between Ru(II) containing PSs and 1

Identifiers

PMID36686369
PMCPMC9850455
OpenAlexW4288032452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.