ArticleResuscitation plus2023
Association between regional cerebral oxygen saturation and outcome of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral oxygen monitoring during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Correlation Between End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comprehensive pre- and in-hospital near-infrared-spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring after return of spontaneous circulation predicts neurological outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of dynamic parameter of trends in vital signs on the prediction of serious events in hospitalized patients -a retrospective observational study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Wolf Creek XVII Part 8: Neuroprotection.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the association between cerebral oxygen saturation (StO2) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients with OHCA to determine the association between ROSC and various StO2 parameters (initial_StO2, final_StO2, mean_StO2, and Δ_StO2 [=final_StO2-initial_StO2]). Time-domain near-infrared spectroscopy was used to determine absolute StO2 values. Results: Of the 108 patients with OHCA, 23 achieved ROSC. Although initial_StO2 values did not differ between the groups, final_StO2, mean_StO2, and Δ_StO2 were higher in the ROSC group than in the non-ROSC group. The cut-off values for initial_StO2, mean_StO2, and Δ_StO2 as predictors of ROSC were 35%, 30%, and 5%, respectively. The odds ratio for ROSC had markedly increased in the Δ_StO2 ≥ 5% subgroup (19.70 [6.06-64.11], p < 0.001). When the change in StO2 (=d_StO2) at 8 min from the initiation of StO2 measurement was assessed, the d_StO2 ≥ 5% subgroup had a higher odds ratio for ROSC than the d_StO2 < 5% subgroup (5.8 [1.78-18.85], p = 0.002), and this tendency was maintained until 20 min. In the evaluation using a two-by-two contingency table with initial_StO2 and Δ_StO2 as two parameters, 61.9% of the patients fell under the categories of initial_StO2 < 35% and Δ_StO2 < 5% and had the lowest rate of ROSC achievement (4.6%). In the Δ_StO2 ≥ 5% subgroup, approximately-two-thirds of the patients achieved ROSC irrespective of the initial_StO2 (initial_StO2 ≥ 35%, 66.7%; initial_StO2 < 35%, 60.0%). Conclusions: Initial_StO2 and Δ_StO2 were associated with the achievement of ROSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.