ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022
Learning with few samples in deep learning for image classification, a mini-review.
Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Casting wider than U-Nets: evaluating the role of novel machine learning applications in radiation therapy.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Recent topics in musculoskeletal imaging focused on clinical applications of AI: How should radiologists approach and use AI?La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: advancing diagnosis, precision surgery, and anti-VEGF therapy optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Use of large language models as a scalable approach to understanding public health discourse.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning has achieved enormous success in various computer tasks. The excellent performance depends heavily on adequate training datasets, however, it is difficult to obtain abundant samples in practical applications. Few-shot learning is proposed to address the data limitation problem in the training process, which can perform rapid learning with few samples by utilizing prior knowledge. In this paper, we focus on few-shot classification to conduct a survey about the recent methods. First, we elaborate on the definition of the few-shot classification problem. Then we propose a newly organized taxonomy, discuss the application scenarios in which each method is effective, and compare the pros and cons of different methods. We classify few-shot image classification methods from four perspectives: (i) Data augmentation, which contains sample-level and task-level data augmentation. (ii) Metric-based method, which analyzes both feature embedding and metric function. (iii) Optimization method, which is compared from the aspects of self-learning and mutual learning. (iv) Model-based method, which is discussed from the perspectives of memory-based, rapid adaptation and multi-task learning. Finally, we conduct the conclusion and prospect of this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.