Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686191›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Relationship between engagement with the impossible task, cognitive testing, and cognitive questionnaires in a population of aging dogs.

Michael Z Khan, Alejandra Mondino, Katharine Russell, Beth Case, Gilad Fefer, Hope Woods, Natasha J Olby, Margaret E Gruen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael Z KhanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Alejandra MondinoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Katharine RussellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Beth CaseDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Gilad FeferDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Hope WoodsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Natasha J OlbyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Margaret E GruenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the engagement of aging dogs with a cognitively challenging and potentially frustrating task (the impossible task). Based on previous observations, we predicted that dogs showing signs of cognitive impairment in other cognitive tests and owner-completed questionnaires would show reduced engagement with the task. Methods: In this task, dogs were shown a piece of food in a clear container that they could not open; time spent interacting with the container and the experimenter was measured. While the impossible task has not been used as a measure of frustration, the parameters of the test design creates a potential frustrate state, making this assessment appropriate. Thirty-two dogs enrolled in a longitudinal aging study participated in the study. Owners were asked to complete two cognitive dysfunction screening questionnaires (Canine Dementia Scale [CADES] and Canine Cognitive Dysfunction Rating Scale [CCDR]) as well a questionnaire assessing general frustration. Dogs participated in multiple measures of cognitive function as well the impossible task. Results: Latency to disengage from the impossible task was faster for dogs with higher total (more impaired) CADES ( Discussion: The high correlation with several cognitive measures and the ease of administration of this test makes it a useful tool in evaluating canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome, however it is unclear if increased frustration or other cognitive processes are contributing to the observed changes.

Indexed as

agingcanine cognitioncanine cognitive dysfunction syndromedogsfrustration

Identifiers

PMID36686191
PMCPMC9848444
OpenAlexW4313585594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.