Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686178›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Evaluation of fecal sampling time points to estimate apparent nutrient digestibility in lactating Holstein dairy cows.

Damiano Cavallini, Alberto Palmonari, Ludovica Maria Eugenia Mammi, Francesca Ghiaccio, Giorgia Canestrari, Andrea Formigoni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential Use of Kasedbok (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damiano CavalliniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alberto PalmonariDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ludovica Maria Eugenia MammiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca GhiaccioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgia CanestrariDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea FormigoniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was the evaluation of nutrient excretion patterns in samples of feces collected every 2 h to define the best sampling protocol for estimation of apparent digestibility. Methods: Four multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows, housed in a tie stall barn and milked twice a day (0800; 1900 h), were enrolled. Dry total mixed ration (TMR) without silages was fed once (0800 h) per day. Feces were sampled every 2 h for 72 h. Each sample was divided in 3 portions: hourly sample sample (8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 00, 2, 4, 6), 8-h composite sample (00-06, 08-14 and 16-22), and a 24-h composite sample. Complete chemical analyses were performed and total tract nutrient digestibility was calculated using undegraded neutral detergent fiber at 240 h of Results and discussion: For some parameters, excretion was not constant throughout the day: neutral detergent fiber (aNDFom), undegraded neutral detergent fiber at 24 h of

Indexed as

apparent digestibilitydairy cowsdry hay-based TMReating behaviorfecal samplingrumination timetime-budgetundegraded NDF

Identifiers

PMID36686178
PMCPMC9849752
OpenAlexW4313563976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.