Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686155›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol following single oral and oral transmucosal administration in dogs.

Giorgia Della Rocca, Fabiola Paoletti, Maria Beatrice Conti, Roberta Galarini, Elisabetta Chiaradia, Monica Sforna, Cecilia Dall'Aglio, Angela Polisca, Alessandra Di Salvo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol, (-)-Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Safety study of cannabidiol products in healthy dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgia Della RoccaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Fabiola PaolettiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, Perugia, Italy.
Maria Beatrice ContiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Roberta GalariniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, Perugia, Italy.
Elisabetta ChiaradiaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Monica SfornaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Cecilia Dall'AglioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Angela PoliscaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alessandra Di SalvoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the last few years, different formulations containing cannabidiol (CBD) were tested with regard to its efficacy on chronic pain, refractory epilepsy, anxiety, aggressive behavior and atopic dermatitis in dogs. CBD is generally administered orally, but its low bioavailability, probably due to a first-pass metabolism, represents a great limitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate if CBD bioavailability increases after oral transmucosal administration (OTM) compared to oral treatment. Methods: Twelve dogs diagnosed with mild chronic pain were enrolled in the study and treated once orally or OTM (6 dogs/group) with a pure CBD in oil formulation at a dosing rate of 1 mg/kg b.w. At prefixed time points, blood samples were collected to define CBD plasma concentrations vs. time profiles, and the main pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained by non-compartmental model. Results: CBD Cmax, Tmax, terminal half-life and AUC Discussion: The OTM administration did not increase cannabidiol bioavailability compared to oral treatment. The almost perfectly superimposable mean plasma concentrations of cannabidiol following the two treatments suggests that CBD is not able to be adsorbed by the oral mucosa or that its absorption is very scarce, and that CBD is swallowed and absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

cannabidiolCBDdogoral administrationoral transmucosal administrationOTMpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID36686155
PMCPMC9859632
OpenAlexW4313644621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.