ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2022
Bronchodilator response after two methods of salbutamol nebulization in asthmatic children.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous versus intermittent nebulization of salbutamol in acute Severe asthma in children under 12 years of age.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Salbutamol is used in bronchodilator response testing (BDRT), which is an important diagnostic tool in bronchial obstructive diseases. Most available studies compare the bronchodilator response of salbutamol administered with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler and salbutamol in a nebulization solution. Aim: The spirometric evaluation of the bronchodilator response of two methods of salbutamol nebulization in asthmatic children. Material and methods: A randomized, open, comparative study was conducted in which 132 children with partially controlled asthma and current bronchial obstruction determined by spirometry were enrolled. BDRT was conducted using salbutamol solution administered with either a continuous jet nebulizer (CON) or a breath-actuated jet nebulizer (BAN). The BAN group received half the dose of the drug compared to the CON group, i.e. 2.5 mg. Changes in FEV Results: The change in FEV Conclusions: Salbutamol inhaled from BAN results in a better bronchodilator response than twice the nominal dose of this drug inhaled from CON, which is due to the absence of drug loss during the expiratory phase and therefore greater pulmonary deposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.