Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685812›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Using whole genome sequence to compare variant callers and breed differences of US sheep.

Morgan R Stegemiller, Reid R Redden, David R Notter, Todd Taylor, J Bret Taylor, Noelle E Cockett, Michael P Heaton, Theodore S Kalbfleisch, Brenda M Murdoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Cytogenetics in Domestic Bovids: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Morgan R StegemillerDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States.
Reid R ReddenTexas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension, Texas A&M University, San Angelo, TX, United States.
David R NotterSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Todd TaylorDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
J Bret TaylorUnited States Sheep Experiment Station, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID, United States.
Noelle E CockettDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Michael P HeatonUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States.
Theodore S KalbfleischGluck Equine Research Center, College of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Brenda M MurdochDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As whole genome sequence (WGS) data sets have become abundant and widely available, so has the need for variant detection and scoring. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of commonly used variant calling programs, Freebayes and GATK HaplotypeCaller (GATK-HC), and to use U.S. sheep WGS data sets to identify novel breed-associated SNPs. Sequence data from 145 sheep consisting of 14 U.S. breeds were filtered and biallelic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were retained for genotyping analyses. Genotypes from both programs were compared to each other and to genotypes from bead arrays. The SNPs from WGS were compared to the bead array data with breed heterozygosity, principal component analysis and identifying breed associated SNPs to analyze genetic diversity. The average sequence read depth was 2.78 reads greater with 6.11% more SNPs being identified in Freebayes compared to GATK-HC. The genotype concordance of the variant callers to bead array data was 96.0% and 95.5% for Freebayes and GATK-HC, respectively. Genotyping with WGS identified 10.5 million SNPs from all 145 sheep. This resulted in an 8% increase in measured heterozygosity and greater breed separation in the principal component analysis compared to the bead array analysis. There were 1,849 SNPs identified in only the Romanov sheep where all 10 rams were homozygous for one allele and the remaining 135 sheep from 13 breeds were homozygous for the opposite allele. Both variant calling programs had greater than 95% concordance of SNPs with bead array data, and either was suitably accurate for ovine WGS data sets. The use of WGS SNPs improved the resolution of PCA analysis and was critical for identifying Romanov breed-associated SNPs. Subsets of such SNPs could be used to estimate germplasm composition in animals without pedigree information.

Indexed as

freebayesGATK HaplotypeCaller (HC)sheepvariant callerswhole genome sequence

Identifiers

PMID36685812
PMCPMC9846548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.