Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685801›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of social work2022

A scoping review of system-level mechanisms to prevent children being in out-of-home care.

Lorna Stabler, Rhiannon Evans, Jonathan Scourfield, Fiona Morgan, Alison Weightman, Simone Willis, Lydia Searchfield, Mel Meindl, Sophie Wood, Ulugbek Nurmatov and 3 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of social work, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lorna StablerChildren's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), Cardiff University, Cathays, CF10 3BD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0742-4271
Rhiannon EvansCentre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cathays, CF10 3BD, UK.
Jonathan ScourfieldChildren's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), Cardiff University, Cathays, CF10 3BD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-8158
Fiona MorganPublic Health Wales, No. 2. Capital Quarter,  Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK.
Alison WeightmanSpecialist Unit for Review Evidence, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Simone WillisSpecialist Unit for Review Evidence, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Lydia SearchfieldSpecialist Unit for Review Evidence, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Mel MeindlChildren's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), Cardiff University, Cathays, CF10 3BD, UK.
Sophie WoodChildren's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), Cardiff University, Cathays, CF10 3BD, UK.
Ulugbek NurmatovSchool of Medicine, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Alison KempSchool of Medicine, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Donald ForresterChildren's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), Cardiff University, Cathays, CF10 3BD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-5718
Sarah L BrandNIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying which approaches can effectively reduce the need for out-of-home care for children is critically important. Despite the proliferation of different interventions and approaches globally, evidence summaries on this topic are limited. This study is a scoping review using a realist framework to explore what research evidence exists about reducing the number of children and young people in care. Searches of databases and websites were used to identify studies evaluating intervention effect on at least one of the following outcomes: reduction in initial entry to care; increase in family reunification post care. Data extracted from papers included type of study, outcome, type and level of intervention, effect, mechanism and moderator, implementation issues and economic (EMMIE) considerations. Data were coded by: primary outcome; level of intervention (community, policy, organisation, family or child); and type of evidence, using the realist EMMIE framework. This is the first example of a scoping review on any topic using this framework. Evaluated interventions were grouped and analysed according to system-level mechanism. We present the spread of evidence across system-level mechanisms and an overview of how each system-level mechanism might reduce the number of children in care. Implications and gaps are identified.

Indexed as

child maltreatmentchild protectioninterventionscoping reviewsocial workstate care

Identifiers

PMID36685801
PMCPMC9847665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.