ArticleJournal of family violence2023
Examining Intimate Partner Violence-Related Fatalities: Past Lessons and Future Directions Using U.S. National Data.
Article in Journal of family violence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular and Orbital Trauma Correlated With an Increased Risk of Mortality in Female Patients With a History of Intimate Partner Violence.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Maternal homicide rates among 15 United States.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The Interplay of Biomarkers and Psychosocial Variables in IPV Perpetration.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Using Radiology as a Screening Tool to Identify Intimate Partner Violence.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025Article
- Closing the Gap: The Need to Eliminate Loopholes in Legislation at the Intersection of Gun Violence and Intimate Partner Violence.The undergraduate journal of public health at the University of Michigan · 2025Article
- Population-Level Surveillance of Domestic Assaults in the Home Using the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS).Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024Article
- Femicide in the United States: a call for legal codification and national surveillance.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- "There's room to do more": a mixed-methods study of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) diversion program and intimate partner violence in Georgia.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Intimate Partner Homicide Among Women of Childbearing Age: Identifying Multilevel Risk Factors with Machine Learning.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- A Transdisciplinary Analysis of Domestic Violence Homicides in Harris County, Texas (2016-2020).Homicide studies · 2023Article
- Article
- Intimate Partner Violence Circumstances for Fatal Violence in the US.JAMA network open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Among homicides in the United States, intimate partners kill almost 50% of female and 10% of male victims. Intimate partner violence (IPV) also contributes to an estimated 6% of suicides. These trends suggest that opportunities for IPV interventions prior to the fatalities may have been missed. Thus, researchers must investigate the context and circumstances of IPV-related fatalities to inform effective prevention strategy development. There are two primary national fatality databases that can be used to examine such factors: the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS, homicide and suicides); and the Uniform Crime Reporting-Supplementary Homicide Reports (UCR-SHR, homicides). These datasets include data on many IPV-related violent deaths but are limited by variations in data quality. Method: This critical review summarizes opportunities and challenges when examining IPV-related fatalities using these national datasets. To document how the current literature is conceptualizing IPV, a rapid review on IPV-related homicide and suicide articles was performed (2019-2022). Missingness analyses were conducted to describe limitations in key dataset variables. Results: These datasets enable tracking IPV-related fatalities nationally over time. However, issues with the operationalization of variables that record IPV circumstances, particularly in the UCR-SHR, and high levels of missingness represent significant barriers to research. Novel methodologies can optimize the use of these datasets. Conclusion: National-level datasets enable researchers to examine IPV-related fatalities, evaluate policy differences between states, and monitor trends and disparities. This research can inform key recommendations for interventions to prevent IPV-related fatalities. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10896-022-00487-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.