ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2023
Pairwise ratio-based differential abundance analysis of infant microbiome 16S sequencing data.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differential abundance analysis of infant 16S microbial sequencing data is complicated by challenging data properties, including high sparsity, extreme dispersion and the relative nature of the information contained within the data. In this study, we propose a pairwise ratio analysis that uses the compositional data analysis principle of subcompositional coherence and merges it with a beta-binomial regression model. The resulting method provides a flexible and easily interpretable approach to infant 16S sequencing data differential abundance analysis that does not require zero imputation. We evaluate the proposed method using infant 16S data from clinical trials and demonstrate that the proposed method has the power to detect differences, and demonstrate how its results can be used to gain insights. We further evaluate the method using data-inspired simulations and compare its power against related methods. Our results indicate that power is high for pairwise differential abundance analysis of taxon pairs that have a large abundance. In contrast, results for sparse taxon pairs show a decrease in power and substantial variability in method performance. While our method shows promising performance on well-measured subcompositions, we advise strong filtering steps in order to avoid excessive numbers of underpowered comparisons in practical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.