ArticleJPRAS open2023
A Novel optimization technique of Computed Tomography Angiographic 3D-reconstructions for pre-operative planning of DIEP flaps.
Article in JPRAS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Reconstruction: Enhancing Surgical Planning, Aesthetic Outcomes, and Patient-Centered Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Microsurgical Planning: A Five-Year Leap in Clinical Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Anomalous anatomic variation of an absent deep inferior epigastric artery: implications for autologous breast reconstruction.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Article
- A Cross-Sectional Validation of Horos and CoreSlicer Software Programs for Body Composition Analysis in Abdominal Computed Tomography Scans in Colorectal Cancer Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transforming breast reconstruction: the pioneering role of artificial intelligence in preoperative planning.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- A History of Innovation: Tracing the Evolution of Imaging Modalities for the Preoperative Planning of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.