Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685619›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

Designing for patient decision-making: Design challenges generated by patients with atrial fibrillation during evaluation of a decision aid prototype.

Janette Fanio, Erin Zeng, Brian Wang, David J Slotwiner, Meghan Reading Turchioe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janette FanioPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
Erin ZengPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
Brian WangPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
David J SlotwinerPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
Meghan Reading TurchioeColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Data-driven shared decision-making to reduce symptom burden in atrial fibrillationR00NR019124 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TURCHIOE, MEGHAN READING · 2022 to 2024
$732k
NINR NIH HHS R00 NR019124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) empowers patients and care teams to determine the best treatment plan in alignment with the patient's preferences and goals. Decision aids are proven tools to support high quality SDM. Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, struggle to identify optimal rhythm and symptom management strategies and could benefit from a decision aid. In this Brief Research Report, we describe the development and preliminary evaluation of an interactive decision-making aid for patients with AF. We employed an iterative, user-centered design method to develop prototypes of the decision aid. Here, we describe multiple iterations of the decision aid, informed by the literature, expert feedback, and mixed-methods design sessions with AF patients. Results highlight unique design requirements for this population, but overall indicate that an interactive decision aid with visualizations has the potential to assist patients in making AF treatment decisions. Future work can build upon these design requirements to create and evaluate a decision aid for AF rhythm and symptom management.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationdecision aidshealth informaticsiterative designmixed-methodsprototypeshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID36685619
PMCPMC9854261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.