Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685453›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

An algorithm for cognitive fusion targeted tumor puncture based on 3-D mathematical modelling.

Yong Luo, Junjie Ren, Jun Long, Li Wang, Hong Zeng, Dali Tong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong LuoDepartment of Urology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Junjie RenSchool of Sciences, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, 610500, Sichuan, China.
Jun LongDepartment of Ultrasound, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, 401147, China.
Li WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Hong ZengDepartment of Urology, Traditional Medicine Hospital of Jiangjin District, Chongqing, 402260, China.
Dali TongDepartment of Urology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Army Medical University · CNJiangjin Central Hospital · CNSouthwest Petroleum University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous puncture is an important means of tumor diagnosis and treatment. At present, most puncture operations are still based on imaging location and clinical experience, and quantitative and accurate targeted puncture cannot be achieved. How to improve the accuracy of percutaneous tumor puncture, avoid errors to the greatest extent, reduce the occurrence of complications, and improve the overall clinical diagnosis and treatment quality and curative effect, are scientific problems worthy of further study. Method: In the present study, mathematical modeling was first used to construct the tumor puncture path, determine the needle entry angle, and define the relevant limited parameters and the substitution formula. Secondly, relevant parameters were extracted from CT and other imaging data and substituted into formulas, the deviation angle and puncture path were determined, and the personalized tumor puncture scheme was carried out. Third, targeted puncture was precisely implemented under the guidance of B-ultrasound. Compared with the traditional empirical puncture, our model improved the accuracy, decreased the puncture time, and reduced the pain of diagnosis and treatment for patients. Results: A tumor-targeted puncture model was established based on mathematical theory and imaging data. By extracting clinical data, such as tumor radius, projection distance of tumor center and projection distance from puncture point to body surface, the optimal puncture deviation angle was modeled and calculated and a personalized puncture scheme was established. Compared with the conventional method, our model markedly increased the puncture accuracy rate by ∼30%. The puncture number was decreased by ∼50% using our model. Furthermore, our model shortened the operation time by 20% to ease pain of patients and guarantee greater security for patients. Doctor satisfaction and patient discomfort scores were examined. Our model improved doctor satisfaction by ∼20% and reduced subjective discomfort of patients by ∼25%. These data revealed that the model could markedly improve the accuracy and efficiency of puncture, clinical efficacy and accuracy of tumor diagnosis. Additionally, the confidence of doctors in the operation was greatly enhanced and patient discomfort was greatly reduced. Conclusion: The present study analyzed in detail how to find the best puncture path using a mathematical model. Based on the mathematical model of cognitive fusion puncture, combined with clinical personalized data and mathematical calculation analysis, accurate puncture was effectively realized. It not only greatly improved the effectiveness of puncture, but also ensured the safety of clinical patients and reduced injury, which means it may be worthy of clinical application.

Indexed as

AlgorithmMathematical modellingPrecise percutaneous tumor punctureRadiological dataSpace analytic geometry

Identifiers

PMID36685453
PMCPMC9852925
OpenAlexW4313367885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.