Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685452›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Inquiry-based learning and students' self-efficacy in Chemistry among secondary schools in Kenya.

Christine Nzomo, Peter Rugano, John Njoroge Mungai, Ciriaka Gitonga Muriithi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine NzomoDepartment of Education, University of Embu, Kenya.
Peter RuganoDepartment of Education, University of Embu, Kenya.
John Njoroge MungaiDepartment of Research & Development Knowledge Management, Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in Africa (CEMASTEA), Kenya.
Ciriaka Gitonga MuriithiDepartment of Education, University of Embu, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) influences educational outcomes such as test scores, students' attitudes, and self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is a significant predictor of the academic performance of students and therefore it is an important construct for measuring attainment of learning objectives. This paper discusses how inquiry-based learning in Chemistry practical lessons enhances students' self-efficacy in Chemistry. A total of 21 Chemistry teachers and 357 Form three Chemistry students were randomly selected from the 21 classrooms that these teachers taught. A concurrent triangulation mixed-methods research design was employed. Data was gathered using an adapted teachers' self-reported IBL instrument and a lesson observation schedule was used to rate the teachers' IBL use in Chemistry practical lessons. Besides, a 26 item instrument was also adapted from existing literature to measure students' self-efficacy in Chemistry. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were used to determine the suitability of measuring tools. Means and percentages were used to examine IBL use and students' self-efficacy while Pearson Correlation coefficient and regression analysis were used to examine the influence of IBL on learners' self-efficacy. Results revealed that teachers used inquiry-based learning once a week (overall mean = 3.89). Also, students' rating of their self-efficacy in Chemistry was high (Mean = 3.929). Finally, the results from correlation and regression analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between inquiry-based learning and students' self-efficacy in Chemistry (r = 0.903, p < 0.05, R

Indexed as

Chemistry practicalInquiry-based learningSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID36685452
PMCPMC9849974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.