Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685417›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Four obstacles to the quality of constitutional law learning in Indonesia.

Ija Suntana, Tedi Priatna

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
27.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ija SuntanaDepartment of Constitutional Law, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia.
Tedi PriatnaDepartment of Islamic Education Science, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia.
Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four factors hinder the quality of constitutional law teaching in Indonesia, namely learning methods, curriculum authority, learning materials, and the uncertainty of legal learning topics. This is the culprit of the low quality of law graduates who are less able to compete in the legal job market. Law lecturers in Indonesia do not reform educational methods or materials, they are more dominant in teaching and not learning. Meanwhile, on the other hand, there are no institutions that focus on evaluating the legal learning process, standardizing, and controlling it, so that it has an impact on measuring learning outcomes. Therefore, solving the problem of the weak quality of constitutional law learning in Indonesia must overcome these four obstacles.

Indexed as

Constitutional lawCurriculumLearning topicsLow qualityMonotonous

Identifiers

PMID36685417
PMCPMC9850039
OpenAlexW4313556450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.