ArticleTransportation research. Part A, Policy and practice2023
The impact of COVID-19 on mobility choices in Switzerland.
Article in Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing urban bike-sharing systems: a stochastic mathematical model for infrastructure planning.Central European journal of operations research · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study on COVID-19 Dynamics: Mathematical Modeling, Predictions, and Resource Allocation Strategies in Romania, Italy, and Switzerland.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic correlates of urban mobility trends in two Australian cities during transitional periods of the COVID-19 pandemic.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- The effect of quarantine policy on pollution emission and the usage of private transportation in urban areas.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- how these findings canPublic transport: lessons learned by the sector through the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Systematic literature review on impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding measures on mobility.Transportation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We study the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated government measures on individual mobility choices in Switzerland. Our data is based on over 1,600 people for which we observe all trips during eight weeks before the pandemic and until May 2021. We find an overall reduction of travel distances by 60 percent, followed by a gradual recovery during the subsequent re-opening of the economy. Whereas driving distances have almost completely recovered, public transport re-mains under-used. The introduction of a requirement to wear a mask in public transport had no measurable impact on ridership. The individual travel response to the pandemic varies along socio-economic dimensions such as education and house-hold size, with mobility tool ownership, and with personal values and lifestyles. We find no evidence for a significant substitution of leisure travel to compensate for the reduction in work-related travel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.