Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685281›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Protein adsorption by nanomechanical mass spectrometry: Beyond the real-time molecular weighting.

Ivo Stachiv, Chih-Yun Kuo, Wei Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivo StachivDepartment of Functional Materials, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia.
Chih-Yun KuoDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Wei LiDepartment of Functional Materials, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During past decades, enormous progress in understanding the mechanisms of the intermolecular interactions between the protein and surface at the single-molecule level has been achieved. These advances could only be possible by the ongoing development of highly sophisticated experimental methods such as atomic force microscopy, optical microscopy, surface plasmon resonance, ellipsometry, quartz crystal microbalance, conventional mass spectrometry, and, more recently, the nanomechanical systems. Here, we highlight the main findings of recent studies on the label-free single-molecule (protein) detection by nanomechanical systems including those focusing on the protein adsorption on various substrate surfaces. Since the nanomechanical techniques are capable of detecting and manipulating proteins even at the single-molecule level, therefore, they are expected to open a new way of studying the dynamics of protein functions. It is noteworthy that, in contrast to other experimental methods, where only given protein properties like molecular weight or protein stiffness can be determined, the nanomechanical systems enable a real-time measurement of the multiple protein properties (e.g., mass, stiffness, and/or generated surface stress), making them suitable for the study of protein adsorption mechanisms. Moreover, we also discuss the possible future trends in label-free detection and analysis of dynamics of protein complexes with these nanomechanical systems.

Indexed as

mass sensingmass spectrometrymolecular weightmolecule mechanical propertiesprotein adsorptionprotein detection

Identifiers

PMID36685281
PMCPMC9849248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.