Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685229›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Comparison of the accuracy of axial length measurement by different imaging methods in Sprague Dawley rats.

Yajun Wu, Xiangdong Luo, Yuliang Feng, Jiasong Yang, Hua Fan, Xiaobo Cen, Wensheng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yajun WuAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiangdong LuoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yuliang FengAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jiasong YangAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hua FanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Aier Eye Ophthalmology Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaobo CenWestChina-Frontier PharmaTech Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wensheng LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Aier Eye Ophthalmology Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Central South University · CNShanghai Eye Disease Prevention & Treatment Center · CNXiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obtaining accurate axial length (AL) is very important for the establishment of animal models of myopia. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of Quantel A-B scan, OD-1 A scan, and vernier caliper in measuring AL in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. Methods: In total, 60 5-week-old SD rats were divided into female rat group ( Results: There were significant differences in AL and diopter of SD rats at the same age ( Conclusion: Sex is the influencing factor of AL and RE. Imaging measurement can accurately measure the AL in living small rodents. Compared with OD-1 A scan, Quantel A-B scan may be more accurate.

Indexed as

axial lengthmeasuring methodOD-1 A scanQuantel A-B scanvernier caliper

Identifiers

PMID36685229
PMCPMC9854123
OpenAlexW4313643738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.