Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685152›Full record

ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2023

The Removal, Excision, Sterilization, and Quarantine (RESQ) Method is a Feasible Alternative Treatment for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections.

Feng-Ching Liao, Chih-Yin Chien, Shu-I Lin, Chun-Che Huang, Ming-Feng Tsai, Wei-Ru Chiou, Po-Lin Lin, Jen-Yuan Kuo, Cheng-Ting Tsai, Ying-Hsiang Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Feng-Ching LiaoCardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei.
Chih-Yin ChienDepartment of Nursing, MacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management.
Shu-I LinCardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei.
Chun-Che HuangDepartment of Healthcare Administration, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung.
Ming-Feng TsaiDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City.
Wei-Ru ChiouDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City.
Po-Lin LinDepartment of Cardiology, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu.
Jen-Yuan KuoCardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei.
Cheng-Ting TsaiCardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei.
Ying-Hsiang LeeCardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei.
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWMackay Medical College · TWI-Shou University · TWMackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management · TWNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend that all infected cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) should be removed. However, financial or anatomical concerns can lead to management of infection with simple debridement, as opposed to complete removal. In this observational study, we report the outcomes of our modified procedure for this real-world dilemma. Methods and Results: The Quarantine (RESQ) method is characterized as follows: the removal (R) of all non-essential foreign materials, including old sutures and leads; the excision (E) of all non-viable, chronically inflamed, granulation, or scar tissue; the sterilization (S) of the remaining generator; and the quarantine (Q) of a new pocket in the sub-muscular layer for reimplantation. From a review of electronic medical records, 30 patients were selected and divided into three groups according to the intervention used: RESQ (n = 9) in group A, simple debridement (n = 16) in group B, and guideline-recommended replacement (n = 5) in group C. Patient baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. After analyzing the proportion of patients that were free from infection one year following their respective interventions, we found that group A performed better than group B (100% and 31.2% infection-free, respectively, p = 0.001), and was comparable to group C (both 100% infection-free, p = not applicable). Conclusions: The RESQ method is a feasible and beneficial alternative for selected patients with CIED infections who are unable to receive a generator replacement according to the recommended guideline.

Indexed as

CIED infectionLead extractionPacemakerPocketRESQ

Identifiers

PMID36685152
PMCPMC9829847
OpenAlexW4317781163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.