Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685088›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Tissue Adhesives for the Management of Corneal Perforations and Challenging Corneal Conditions.

Ashok Sharma, Namrata Sharma, Sayan Basu, Rajan Sharma, Shruti Aggarwal, Parul Chawla Gupta, Jagat Ram, Verinder S Nirankari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combined PRP and Contact Lens for Corneal Ulcer Perforation: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashok SharmaDr Ashok Sharma Cornea Centre, Chandigarh, UT, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-7033
Namrata SharmaCornea Service, Dr. R. P. Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2124-7542
Sayan BasuLVPEI Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Rajan SharmaDr Ashok Sharma Cornea Centre, Chandigarh, UT, India.
Shruti AggarwalAnterior Segment Cataract Surgery, Katzen Eye Group, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Parul Chawla GuptaAdvanced Eye Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh, UT, India.
Jagat RamAdvanced Eye Centre PGIMER, Chandigarh, UT, India.
Verinder S NirankariUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ashok Leyland (India) · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · INL V Prasad Eye Institute · INUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal perforations are ophthalmological emergencies which can have serious and detrimental consequences, if not managed timely and appropriately. These are a significant cause of ocular morbidity and can result in decreased vision, blindness, and even loss of the eye. Corneal perforations can be managed using a range of treatment approaches, including temporary solutions such as the application of corneal glue and bandage contact lens, as well as definitive treatment such as corneal transplantation. Tissue glues/adhesives were developed as substitutes for sutures in ophthalmic surgery. Unlike sutures, these glues are associated with shorter overall surgical times and reduced inflammation, thus improving postoperative comfort without compromising wound strength. The available tissue adhesives can be broadly classified into two types: synthetic (eg, cyanoacrylate derivatives) and biological (eg, fibrin glue). Cyanoacrylate glue is chiefly used as a corneal patch to manage acute corneal perforations and improve visual outcomes. Fibrin glue can be used instead of cyanoacrylate glue in many conditions with the benefits of reduced conjunctival and corneal inflammation and reaction. Apart from this, each type of adhesive is distinct in terms of its benefits as well as limitations and is accordingly used for different indications. The present review focuses on the two main types of tissue adhesives, their applications in the management of corneal perforations, the associated complications, safety and efficacy data related to their use available in the literature and the need for newer adhesives in this field.

Indexed as

corneal patchcorneal perforationcyanoacrylatefibrin gluetissue adhesives

Identifiers

PMID36685088
PMCPMC9851054
OpenAlexW4316170681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.