ArticleJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2023
Antinociceptive efficacy of
Article in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Research hotspots and trends of acupoint and pain based on PubMed: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Flavonoids fromADMET & DMPK · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Purpose: The present study aimed to assess the CNS safety pharmacology and antinociceptive and antiinflammatory effects of CP extract. Methods: The effect of CP extract on CNS safety pharmacology was assessed using LABORAS automated home cage monitoring and rotarod test. Its pharmacological activity was evaluated both in-vitro, and in-vivo using hot-plate, acetic acid-induced writhing, formalin, and carrageenan-induced paw edema models. Results and conclusion: CP extract significantly improved thermal and chemical nociceptive behaviors and acute inflammatory pain at all doses: 300, 600, and 1200 mg/kg, p.o. The antiinflammatory effect of CP extract in inflammatory pain models was comparable to the effect of positive control: indomethacin 10 mg/kg at all dose levels tested. Further, the CP extract at 600 mg/kg dose significantly inhibited 82.3% of carrageenan-induced total edema. In-vitro, CP extract at 12.5, 25, and 50 μg/mL concentrations significantly reduced the expression of LPS-induced nitric oxide, IL-6, and TNF-α expression in both RAW 264.7 macrophage and BV-2 microglial cell lines. In addition, CP extract did not show any potential effects on the CNS, indicated by no significant effects on motor coordination, spontaneous locomotor activity, general behaviors, and well-being compared to vehicle-treated mice (p > 0.05). Overall, the present study evidences the potential antinociceptive, antiinflammatory efficacies of CP extract with a favorable CNS safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.