Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36685009›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

NS-HGlio: A generalizable and repeatable HGG segmentation and volumetric measurement AI algorithm for the longitudinal MRI assessment to inform RANO in trials and clinics.

Aly H Abayazeed, Ahmed Abbassy, Michael Müeller, Michael Hill, Mohamed Qayati, Shady Mohamed, Mahmoud Mekhaimar, Catalina Raymond, Prachi Dubey, Kambiz Nael and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Aly H AbayazeedBiomedical Engineering group, Neosoma Inc., Groton, Massachusetts, USA (Originating Institution address:44 Farmers Row, Groton, Massachusetts, 01450), USA.
Ahmed AbbassyBiomedical Engineering group, Neosoma Inc., Groton, Massachusetts, USA (Originating Institution address:44 Farmers Row, Groton, Massachusetts, 01450), USA.
Michael MüellerBiomedical Engineering group, Neosoma Inc., Groton, Massachusetts, USA (Originating Institution address:44 Farmers Row, Groton, Massachusetts, 01450), USA.
Michael HillBiomedical Engineering group, Neosoma Inc., Groton, Massachusetts, USA (Originating Institution address:44 Farmers Row, Groton, Massachusetts, 01450), USA.
Mohamed QayatiBiomedical Engineering group, Neosoma Inc., Groton, Massachusetts, USA (Originating Institution address:44 Farmers Row, Groton, Massachusetts, 01450), USA.
Shady MohamedBiomedical Engineering group, Neosoma Inc., Groton, Massachusetts, USA (Originating Institution address:44 Farmers Row, Groton, Massachusetts, 01450), USA.
Mahmoud MekhaimarRadiology Department, University of Cairo School of Medicine, Egypt.
Catalina RaymondBrain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Prachi DubeyRadiology Department, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kambiz NaelRadiology Department, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Saurabh RohatgiRadiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Vaishali KapareRadiology Department, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Ashwini KulkarniRadiology Department, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Tina ShiangRadiology Department, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Atul KumarRadiology Department, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nicolaus AndratschkeRadiation Oncology Department, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WillmannRadiation Oncology Department, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander BrawanskiRadiology Department, University of Cairo School of Medicine, Egypt.
Reordan De JesusRadiology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Ibrahim TunaRadiology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Steve H FungRadiology Department, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Joseph C LandolfiNeurology/Neuro-oncology Department, Hackensack Meridian Health JFK Medical Center, Edison, New Jersey, USA.
Benjamin M EllingsonBrain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-6640
Mauricio ReyesARTORG Biomedical Engineering group, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Yvonne Yu-Hsuan Chen · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
Role of decorin and diffusion MRI in anti-VEGF efficacy for recurrent glioblastomaR01CA270027 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TIMOTHY CLOUGHESY, Benjamin M. Ellingson · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015NCI NIH HHS R01 CA270027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate and repeatable measurement of high-grade glioma (HGG) enhancing (Enh.) and T2/FLAIR hyperintensity/edema (Ed.) is required for monitoring treatment response. 3D measurements can be used to inform the modified Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology criteria. We aim to develop an HGG volumetric measurement and visualization AI algorithm that is generalizable and repeatable. Methods: A single 3D-Convoluted Neural Network, NS-HGlio, to analyze HGG on MRIs using 5-fold cross validation was developed using retrospective (557 MRIs), multicentre (38 sites) and multivendor (32 scanners) dataset divided into training (70%), validation (20%), and testing (10%). Six neuroradiologists created the ground truth (GT). Additional Internal validation (IV, three institutions) using 70 MRIs, and External validation (EV, single institution) using 40 MRIs through measuring the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of Enh., Ed. ,and Enh. + Ed. (WholeLesion/WL) tumor tissue and repeatability testing on 14 subjects from the TCIA MGH-QIN-GBM dataset using volume correlations between timepoints were performed. Results: IV Preoperative median DSC Enh. 0.89 (SD 0.11), Ed. 0.88 (0.28), WL 0.88 (0.11). EV Preoperative median DSC Enh. 0.82 (0.09), Ed. 0.83 (0.11), WL 0.86 (0.06). IV Postoperative median DSC Enh. 0.77 (SD 0.20), Ed 0.78. (SD 0.09), WL 0.78 (SD 0.11). EV Postoperative median DSC Enh. 0.75 (0.21), Ed 0.74 (0.12), WL 0.79 (0.07). Repeatability testing; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.95 Enh. and 0.92 Ed. Conclusion: NS-HGlio is accurate, repeatable, and generalizable. The output can be used for visualization, documentation, treatment response monitoring, radiation planning, intra-operative targeting, and estimation of Residual Tumor Volume among others.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegliomamachine learningRANOsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36685009
PMCPMC9850874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.