Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684877›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Brazilian pregnant women vaccinated with one or two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer/Wyeth

Mauro César da Silva, Neila Caroline Henrique da Silva, Ana Laura Carneiro Gomes Ferreira, Fernanda Carneiro Gomes Ferreira, Maria Inês Bezerra de Melo, Letícia Micherlyne Xavier da Silva, Camila Rodrigues de Melo Barbosa, Jurandy Júnior Ferraz de Magalhães, George Tadeu Nunes Diniz, Ariani Impieri Souza and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mauro César da SilvaLaboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Immunology, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Neila Caroline Henrique da SilvaLaboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Immunology, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Ana Laura Carneiro Gomes FerreiraWomen Health Research Group of Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil.
Fernanda Carneiro Gomes FerreiraUniversity of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Maria Inês Bezerra de MeloPernambuco College of Health (FPS), Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Brazil.
Letícia Micherlyne Xavier da SilvaPernambuco College of Health (FPS), Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Brazil.
Camila Rodrigues de Melo BarbosaClinical Hospital, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Jurandy Júnior Ferraz de MagalhãesCentral Laboratory of Pernambuco, State Secretary of Health, Recife, Brazil.
George Tadeu Nunes DinizLaboratory of Computational Methods, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Recife, Brazil.
Ariani Impieri SouzaWomen Health Research Group of Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil.
Norma Lucena-SilvaLaboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Immunology, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women have an increased risk of developing severe coronavirus disease. In Brazil, the number of hospitalizations and adverse outcomes, including death caused by COVID-19, in women during the pregnancy-puerperal cycle was high in the first pandemic year. Doubts regarding vaccines' efficacy and safety for the mother and fetus delayed vaccination. This study evaluated the generation of IgG titers and neutralizing antibodies to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in 209 healthy pregnant women. For this, were used the QuantiVac ELISA (IgG) and SARS-CoV-2 NeutraLISA kits (EUROIMMUN, Lübeck, SH) following the manufacturer's recommendations. One dose vaccine produced anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in 85% (81/95), and two produced in 95% (76/80) women. Among unvaccinated women, four of 34 (12%) showed protection. The first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine protected 69% of the women with neutralizing antibodies (median of %IH = 97). In the second dose, protection occurred in 94% of the pregnant women (median of IH% = 97). This study showed no differences in IgG antibody titers between one- and two-dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine groups, boosting with the second dose increased the number of women who produced specific IgG and neutralizing antibodies, raising by 114-folds the chance of producing the SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies compared to the unvaccinated pregnant woman, which may contribute to reduce the chance of severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineBrazilFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineImmunoglobulin GCOVID-19IgGneutralizing antibodiespregnancySARS-CoV-2vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36684877
PMCPMC9845874
OpenAlexW4313588434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.