ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
YOLO-P: An efficient method for pear fast detection in complex orchard picking environment.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress and prospect of key technologies of fruit target recognition for robotic fruit picking.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Pooled it
- Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- A Review of Orchard Canopy Perception Technologies for Variable-Rate Spraying.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- ELD-YOLO: A Lightweight Framework for Detecting Occluded Mandarin Fruits in Plant Research.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- GESC-YOLO: Improved Lightweight Printed Circuit Board Defect Detection Based Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AHG-YOLO: multi-category detection for occluded pear fruits in complex orchard scenes.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing automated pear picking using Mamba architecture.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Article
- An innovative approach to detecting the freshness of fruits and vegetables through the integration of convolutional neural networks and bidirectional long short-term memory network.Current research in food science · 2024Article
- Article
- A New Efficient Multi-Object Detection and Size Calculation for Blended Tobacco Shreds Using an Improved YOLOv7 Network and LWC Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Orchard monitoring based on unmanned aerial vehicles and image processing by artificial neural networks: a systematic review.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fruit detection is one of the key functions of an automatic picking robot, but fruit detection accuracy is seriously decreased when fruits are against a disordered background and in the shade of other objects, as is commmon in a complex orchard environment. Methods: Here, an effective mode based on YOLOv5, namely YOLO-P, was proposed to detect pears quickly and accurately. Shuffle block was used to replace the Conv, Batch Norm, SiLU (CBS) structure of the second and third stages in the YOLOv5 backbone, while the inverted shuffle block was designed to replace the fourth stage's CBS structure. The new backbone could extract features of pears from a long distance more efficiently. A convolutional block attention module (CBAM) was inserted into the reconstructed backbone to improve the robot's ability to capture pears' key features. Hard-Swish was used to replace the activation functions in other CBS structures in the whole YOLOv5 network. A weighted confidence loss function was designed to enhance the detection effect of small targets. Result: At last, model comparison experiments, ablation experiments, and daytime and nighttime pear detection experiments were carried out. In the model comparison experiments, the detection effect of YOLO-P was better than other lightweight networks. The results showed that the module's average precision (AP) was 97.6%, which was 1.8% higher than the precision of the original YOLOv5s. The model volume had been compressed by 39.4%, from 13.7MB to only 8.3MB. Ablation experiments verified the effectiveness of the proposed method. In the daytime and nighttime pear detection experiments, an embedded industrial computer was used to test the performance of YOLO-P against backgrounds of different complexities and when fruits are in different degrees of shade. Discussion: The results showed that YOLO-P achieved the highest F1 score (96.1%) and frames per second (FPS) (32 FPS). It was sufficient for the picking robot to quickly and accurately detect pears in orchards. The proposed method can quickly and accurately detect pears in unstructured environments. YOLO-P provides support for automated pear picking and can be a reference for other types of fruit detection in similar environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.