Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684779›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Activation of CO

Lucía Arce Cubas, Richard L Vath, Emmanuel L Bernardo, Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel Sales, Angela C Burnett, Johannes Kromdijk

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Faster relaxation of nonphotochemical quenching in C4 than in C3 species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucía Arce CubasThe University of Cambridge, Department of Plant Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard L VathThe University of Cambridge, Department of Plant Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Emmanuel L BernardoThe University of Cambridge, Department of Plant Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel SalesThe University of Cambridge, Department of Plant Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Angela C BurnettThe University of Cambridge, Department of Plant Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Johannes KromdijkThe University of Cambridge, Department of Plant Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite their importance for the global carbon cycle and crop production, species with C Methods: In this study we aimed to characterise differences between C Results: Our results confirm C Discussion: The sheer variation in photosynthetic induction responses observed in our limited sample of species highlights the importance of controlling for evolutionary distance when comparing C

Indexed as

C3 photosynthesisC4 photosynthesisCO2 assimilationlight responsenon-steady statephotorespirationphotosynthetic induction

Identifiers

PMID36684779
PMCPMC9848656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.