Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Maize-soybean intercropping at optimal N fertilization increases the N uptake, N yield and N use efficiency of maize crop by regulating the N assimilatory enzymes.

Jamal Nasar, Chang Jiang Zhao, Rayyan Khan, Hina Gul, Harun Gitari, Zeqiang Shao, Ghulam Abbas, Imran Haider, Zafar Iqbal, Waqas Ahmed and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jamal NasarGuangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-products Safety, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Chang Jiang ZhaoGuangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-products Safety, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Rayyan KhanGuangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-products Safety, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Hina GulNational Center of Industrial Biotechnology, Pir Mehr Ali Shah (PMAS) Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Harun GitariDepartment of Agricultural Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Zeqiang ShaoCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, Jilin, China.
Ghulam AbbasNational Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Imran HaiderNational Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Zafar IqbalNational Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Waqas AhmedNational Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Raheela RehmanDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Qing Ping LiangGuangxi Agricultural Vocational University, Nanning, China.
Xun Bo ZhouGuangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-products Safety, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Juan YangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-products Safety, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Guangxi University · CNIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKJilin University of Chemical Technology · CNKenyatta University · KENanning Normal University · CNPir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University · PKUniversity of Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Surplus use of chemical nitrogen (N) fertilizers to increase agricultural Q9 production causes severe problems to the agricultural ecosystem and environment. This is contrary to N use efficiency and sustainable agricultural production. Methods: Hence, this study was designed to investigate the effect of maizesoybean intercropping on N uptake, N yield, N utilization use efficiency, and the associated nitrogen assimilatory enzymes of maize crops under different N fertilization for two consecutive years 2021-2022. Results: The findings of the study showed that intercropping at the optimal N rate (N1) (250 kg N ha-1) increased significantly maize grain yield by 30 and 34%, residue yield by 30 and 37%, and 100-grain weight by 33 and 39% in the year 2021 and 2022, respectively. As compared with mono-cropping, at this optimal N rate, the respective increase (of maize's crop N yield indices) for 2021 and 2022 were 53 and 64% for grain N yield, and 53 and 68% for residue N yield. Moreover, intercropping at N1 resulted in higher grain N content by 28 and 31%, residue N content by 18 and 22%, and total N uptake by 65 and 75% in 2021 and 2022, respectively. The values for the land equivalent ratio for nitrogen yield (LERN) were greater than 1 in intercropping, indicating better utilization of N under the intercropping over mono-cropping. Similarly, intercropping increased the N assimilatory enzymes of maize crops such as nitrate reductase (NR) activity by 19 and 25%, nitrite reductase (NiR) activity by 20 and 23%, and glutamate synthase activity (GOGAT) by 23 and 27% in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Consequently, such increases resulted in improved nitrogen use efficiency indices such as N use efficiency (NUE), partial factor nitrogen use efficiency (PFNUE), nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE), and nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE) under intercropping than mono-cropping. Conclusion: Thus, this suggests that maize-soybean intercropping under optimal N fertilization can improve the nitrogen status and nitrogen use efficiency of maize crops by regulating the nitrogen assimilatory enzymes, thereby enhancing its growth and yield. Therefore, prioritizing intercropping over an intensive mono-cropping system could be a better option for sustainable agricultural production.

Indexed as

agricultural sustainabilitymaize-soybean intercroppingnitrogen assimilatory enzymesnitrogen use efficiencynitrogen yield

Identifiers

PMID36684768
PMCPMC9846272
OpenAlexW4313584542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.