Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684764›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Application of chloroplast genome in the identification of

Hui Fang, Guona Dai, Binbin Liao, Ping Zhou, Yinglin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Genomic Analysis of TwoLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Therapeutic Effects ofPediatric discovery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A review ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative analysis of the medicinal plantFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hui FangCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Dali University, Dali, China.
Guona DaiCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Dali University, Dali, China.
Binbin LiaoCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Dali University, Dali, China.
Ping ZhouCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Dali University, Dali, China.
Yinglin LiuCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Dali University, Dali, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: In this study, the complete chloroplast genome of nine species of the genus Results: This study revealed that all of these species exhibited a conserved quadripartite structure, which includes a large single copy (LSC) region and small single copy (SSC) region, and two copies of inverted repeat regions (IRa and IRb), which separate the LSC and SSC regions. And the genome structure, codon usage, and repeat sequences were highly conserved and showed similarities among the nine species. Three highly variable regions ( Conclusion: This study provides valuable information for further species identification, evolution, and phylogenetic research of

Indexed as

chloroplast genomemolecular markerPhyllanthus urinariaphylogeneticspecies identification

Identifiers

PMID36684764
PMCPMC9853280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.