Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684760›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2022

Nutrient deficiency effects on root architecture and root-to-shoot ratio in arable crops.

Gina Lopez, Seyed Hamid Ahmadi, Wulf Amelung, Miriam Athmann, Frank Ewert, Thomas Gaiser, Martina I Gocke, Timo Kautz, Johannes Postma, Shimon Rachmilevitch and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
89.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Humic Acid Alleviates Aluminum Toxicity inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Phosphorus-SolubilizingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Gina LopezCrop Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Seyed Hamid AhmadiCrop Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Wulf AmelungSoil Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Miriam AthmannOrganic Farming and Cropping Systems, University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Frank EwertCrop Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas GaiserCrop Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martina I GockeSoil Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Timo KautzCrop Science, Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes PostmaInstitute of Bio-Geosciences (IBG-2, Plant Sciences), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Shimon RachmilevitchBlaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Gabriel SchaafPlant Nutrition Group, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andrea SchnepfInstitute for Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-3, Agrosphere), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Alixandrine StoschusCrop Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Michelle WattSchool of BioSciences, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peng YuCrop Functional Genomics, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sabine Julia SeidelCrop Science, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DEBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DELeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research · DEThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Kassel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant root traits play a crucial role in resource acquisition and crop performance when soil nutrient availability is low. However, the respective trait responses are complex, particularly at the field scale, and poorly understood due to difficulties in root phenotyping monitoring, inaccurate sampling, and environmental conditions. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 field studies to identify the effects of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), or potassium (K) deficiencies on the root systems of common crops. Root length and biomass were generally reduced, while root length per shoot biomass was enhanced under N and P deficiency. Root length decreased by 9% under N deficiency and by 14% under P deficiency, while root biomass was reduced by 7% in N-deficient and by 25% in P-deficient soils. Root length per shoot biomass increased by 33% in N deficient and 51% in P deficient soils. The root-to-shoot ratio was often enhanced (44%) under N-poor conditions, but no consistent response of the root-to-shoot ratio to P-deficiency was found. Only a few K-deficiency studies suited our approach and, in those cases, no differences in morphological traits were reported. We encountered the following drawbacks when performing this analysis: limited number of root traits investigated at field scale, differences in the timing and severity of nutrient deficiencies, missing data (e.g., soil nutrient status and time of stress), and the impact of other conditions in the field. Nevertheless, our analysis indicates that, in general, nutrient deficiencies increased the root-length-to-shoot-biomass ratios of crops, with impacts decreasing in the order deficient P > deficient N > deficient K. Our review resolved inconsistencies that were often found in the individual field experiments, and led to a better understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying root plasticity in fields with low nutrient availability.

Indexed as

fertilizernitrogennutrient limitationphosphorouspotassiumroot morphologyroot plasticity

Identifiers

PMID36684760
PMCPMC9846339
OpenAlexW4313485351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.