Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684669›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Detect feature edges for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Jie Li, Yaotang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie LiSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7569-3727
Yaotang LiSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yunnan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most common diseases among women of reproductive age is bacterial vaginosis (BV). However, the etiology of BV remains unknown. In this study, we modeled the temporal sample of the vaginal microbiome as a network and investigated the relationship between the network edges and BV. Furthermore, we used feature selection algorithms including decision tree (DT) and ReliefF (RF) to select the network feature edges associated with BV and subsequently validated these feature edges through logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM). The results show that: machine learning can distinguish vaginal community states (BV, ABV, SBV, and HEA) based on a few feature edges; selecting the top five feature edges of importance can achieve the best accuracy for the feature selection and classification model; the feature edges selected by DT outperform those selected by RF in terms of classification algorithm LR and SVM, and LR with DT feature edges is more suitable for diagnosing BV; two feature selection algorithms exhibit differences in the importance of ranking of edges; the feature edges selected by DT and RF cannot construct sub-network associated with BV. In short, the feature edges selected by our method can serve as indicators for personalized diagnosis of BV and aid in the clarification of a more mechanistic interpretation of its etiology.

Indexed as

Vaginosis, BacterialAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineVaginaBacterial vaginosisClassificationFeature edgesMachine learningNetwork

Identifiers

PMID36684669
PMCPMC9854373
OpenAlexW4316673419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.