Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36684429›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022

Lost in transduction: Critical considerations when using viral vectors.

William C Hines, William C Hines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

William C HinesSandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
William C HinesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, University of NM, Albuquerque, NM, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of retroviral vectors in the laboratory requires considerations that often go overlooked but are often easy to circumvent. Here, we discuss the relationship between the observed transduction efficiency of a cell population and per-cell viral insertions-and describe how differential cell-type susceptibilities can confound results. We consider the math underlying this problem and review an alternative approach to the commonly used "multiplicity of infection" (MOI) method of titering and using viral vectors in the biomedical research laboratory.

Indexed as

cell barcodinglentiviral vectorsmultiplicity of infection (MOI)scientific reproducibilityviral transduction

Identifiers

PMID36684429
PMCPMC9849944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.